What the studio remains answerable for
- —A tool is chosen for the work, not for the novelty.
- —Sources, inputs and generated outputs are recorded and clearly distinguished.
- —Rights are checked, a named human owns the final decision and every working file is handed over.
Case file 001 · Contrada Canyon
The canyon had to move at the speed of the hand.
One photograph, two measured ridgelines and a scroll-controlled dawn. The first build worked in Chromium and failed under Safari micro-scroll and pointer input. We kept the scene and repaired the system beneath it.
Palette sampled from the source
Five colours · one photograph
- 01 · SourceMeasured from the material.The palette came from the photograph. Each luminous edge follows the actual rock, and the sun rises where the two traces meet.
- 02 · ConstraintThe visitor keeps control.Scroll and light answer the hand directly: no synthetic smoothing, no automatic timeline and no change to the contours or narrative timing.
- 03 · FailureOne browser exposed the truth.Safari revealed a 120 ms exclusion window, delayed pointer mapping and SVG mask work that Chromium made easy to overlook.
- 04 · RepairFix the system, keep the scene.Direct input was restored, invisible SVG work was stopped and the expensive luminance-mask path disappeared.
The effect was never the case study. Keeping it responsive without changing what the visitor saw was the work.
Back to the canyon